Tuesday, May 11, 2010

This will not end well...

Unprecedented unemployment, falling home prices, and insolvent banks have led to the federal government filling the gap via massive deficit spending.  The Obama Administration expects continued deficit spending in excess of $1 Trillion for the next decade.  Let’s explore this path and why deficit spending cannot continue at this pace for another decade.

Government balance sheets
Federal government tax receipts continue to decline year over year [1], [2], and state and local tax receipts don't look any better [3], [4], [5], [6].  While state and local governments slash their budgets and their staffs, federal government spending remains at or near record high levels as money from stimulus programs is deployed.  These two factors have put the federal government on pace for record deficits for fiscal year 2010 [7], [8], [9], [10].

As stimulus funds run out, budgeted spending in several other areas will cause deficits to remain in excess of $1 trillion. The FICA tax is no longer collecting enough to fund Social Security [11].  Military spending continues to expand out of control [12], [13].  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which I discussed in a previous post, will need a continual bailout as the housing bubble deflates  [14], [15], [16].  Social Security, Medicare, and Medicare will continue to consume a larger and larger percent of the Federal Budget [17], [18].  The FDIC is deeply in the red [19].  A large portion of municipal bond market will either default or require a bailout [20].  Public pension plans are severely underfunded and will require extreme tax increases, partial default, or a federal bailout [21], [22].  Oh, and if that isn't enough, the government is simply lost $98.7 billion last year [23].

The current budget deficits are adding to the an already bleak financial outlook for the federal balance sheet.  Federal deficit at the end of fiscal year 2009 was $11.45 trillion.  Using generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP) which includes liabilities associated with Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, the deficit is $63.6 trillion [24]. These numbers don’t include the cost of continuing to bailout Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, new healthcare mandates, future bailouts of state governments, and bailout of public pensions.  When you add up all debts (public and private) they equal 850% of GDP [25].  Folks, this will not end well..

Sovereign Debt Crisis
With politicians in Washington unwilling or unable to do the math [26], the future solvency of the US government lies in doubt. There is already indication that we are buying our own debt to fund our spending and to maintain low interest rates [27], [28], [29].  This action is simply a poorly disguised way to print money.  While this policy may be tolerated over the short term, several bond experts expect interest rates to rise over the next two years [30], [31], [32].  Increasing interest rates will cause debt service to consume a larger and larger proportion of the Federal budget and U.S. GDP [33].

While attempts will be made to fill the deficit by increasing taxes [34], [35], this “solution” will only delay what I view as the inevitable conclusion.  In order to clear government debts at all levels, default is the only option.  While state and local governments may explicitly default on their bonds and slash their pension obligations by revoking promised benefits. The federal government is likely to take the least responsible and most painful path, outright money printing. From Bloomberg:
Nobel laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz said the prospect of a default by the U.S. or the U.K. is an “absurd” notion constructed in financial markets. Both nations “deserve to keep the Aaa rating” and “the likelihood of a default is so small, particularly in the U.S. because all we do is print money to pay it back,” he said in response to questions after a speech in London yesterday. “The notion of a default is so absurd, it’s another reflection of the absurdities in the financial markets.” [36]


Outright money printing will lead to a crisis in the bond market.  Sometimes a sovereign debt crisis quickly precipitates into a currency crisis.  Historically in this scenario, some citizens are able to escape the crisis by moving their assets into another country’s currency, but as the above figure shows, most of the governments in the developed world are insolvent [37], [38].  If a currency crisis is triggered in one major economy, it is likely to stretch across the globe.  Let me emphasize that this outcome is not yet a certainty, but my personal view is that politicians are unwilling to force the necessary sacrifices on the American people.  Therefore, unless behavior changes dramatically in short order, deficit spending will not sustained for the next decade because we will enter a sovereign debt crisis, and perhaps a currency crisis/hyperinflation.

Lessons from current events
You have certainly heard the news of the ongoing sovereign debt crisis in Greece.  While Greece may still get bailed out, this route is an option only because their economy is small [39].  Unfortunately, the other so called PIIGS countries are approaching the point where they too may enter a sovereign debt crisis.  Over the next three years, these countries will need to issue around $2 Trillion in bonds (debt) [40].  This money does not exist and will need to be printed.  On the other hand if governments decided to default, it would destroy major banks in both Europe and the US [41].  The precedent set by TARP is that the politicians will not allow the banks to fail.  The banks will return the favor and buy government bonds.  Unfortunately, this scenario continues the current trend [42].  It leaves little money to loan to private entities which should result in the further deterioration of small business and the overall economy.

Update: As I was completing this post, a nearly $1 Trillion (~750 Billion Euro) bailout package was put together by central banks are around the world to "stabilize" Europe and its banks.  As I stated, this money was created out of thin air. The U.S. Federal Reserve was responsible for ~$50 Billion of this package.

Hyperinflation: A Crisis of Confidence
While the exact timing of a US sovereign debt crisis is uncertain, you can predict this outcome by doing a little math. Simply look at the growth in debts versus the growth in GDP. Very soon, total debt will run grow too big be serviced by GDP (total incomes).  Eventually, the citizens will awaken to the fact the government is willing to print money to pay them back.  If citizens' confidence in US dollars fails, they panic and the rush into tangible assets begins.  Anything not invested in secure tangible assets or companies not relying on non-discretionary spending will undergo a dramatic fall in value.  Paper assets like annuities and government debt will be nearly wiped out because they will be priced in devalued US dollars.  Protect your family, protect your wealth, and protect your future, buy some tangible assets like gold and silver immediately.  Gold and silver are insurance against a total failure of the financial system.  You can read another excellent analysis of this topic here [43].

Timing of the crisis
Let me clear, the United States may not be the first major economy to fall.  Beyond the PIIGS countries, Japan is at risk of a sovereign debt crisis [44].  The U.K is also at risk [45].  These countries may try to implement all sorts of policies to avoid this outcome [46] including nationalization of citizens' assets (see Argentina 2008).  These policies will fail as those of the past two decades [47].  No amount of 'policy' can change the mathematics.  So while the timing of the failure is unknown, the U.S. government is now bankrupt [48].  We need to start making adjustments to our personal affairs and demand the federal government begin adjusting as well.  A sudden, forced adjustment due to a crisis in the financial markets would be catastrophic to our economy [49].

The financial crisis of Fall 2008 began quietly in spring 2007 with failure small subprime lenders.  Some believe, as do I, that the second wave of the financial crisis has now begun and will intensify through the rest of 2010 [50].  When this crisis will peak, no one knows, but the sovereign debt crisis in Greece and the recent shock to the stock market are clear signs of instability in the financial system.  Please prepare yourself and your family for tough economic times ahead.

God Bless,
Matt

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Citizens, The government says I can lie to you. Sincerely, The Banks

In my last post, I illustrated that home prices are likely to continue falling and will lead to billions of dollars in mortgage defaults.  Regrettably, this problem does not exist in isolation and should be reflected in the balance sheets of our financial institutions.  Curiously, the big banks have reported massive profits for the past couple of quarters [1].  So the question that must be answered is: How are the banks turning a profit when they should be losing billions on loans?

Once again, they are obscuring the truth, and the government is complicit in the ruse!  Let me show you how.

From Reality to Fantasy
Last year, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was pressured by several senators and congressmen to relax a rule related to marked-to-market accounting. Marked-to-market accounting forced banks to mark loans to the value at which they could sell them on the open market. However using this accounting method, many of the biggest banks in the country would have been insolvent and unable to pass the “stress tests” last spring. So FASB yielded to political pressure and relaxed the mark-to-market accounting the rules. The rule change allowed banks to price bad loans to whatever their computer model said it was worth.  Unsurprisingly, the banks said they believed they would recover 90% to 100% of a loan’s value.  This practice is what some folks now call “mark to fantasy” accounting because computer models can be made to say anything [2].

Well, do we have any evidence to that these loans are worth less (err...worthless)? Yes, we do. The FDIC has closed over a hundred banks over the last twelve months and has had to find someone to take over these businesses. FDIC has been taking losses equal to 25% or more of the bank’s on entire asset portfolio [3].  Furthermore, delinquency rates in excess of 35% are being reported for many residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) [4]. These two pieces merely imply that something is amiss within the banks.  Let me be more specific. The biggest four banks have $448 billion dollars of second liens and/or home equity lines of credit (HELOC) on their books [5], [6].  Many of these loans are on homes which are underwater on their first mortgage.  If the first lien is worth less than 100% then many of these loans are worth exactly zero, yet they are being reported at 90+% of value on banks’ books. Still, many of the losses are still hidden in their financial statements. The Federal Home Loan Banks [7] and Wells Fargo [8] are a prime examples of this type of accounting.

Bottom Line: The valuation of these loans are a fantasy.


Setting Up Crisis 2.0
Recently, it has been reported what set off the failure of Lehman Brothers and the financial crisis of 2008. Lehman Brothers was manipulating their quarterly reports using complicated financial instruments to make it appear they had billions in cash when they actually owned billions in bad loans [9], [10]. In reality, Lehman Brothers had almost no cash, and many on Wall Street knew it for months in advance.  It is also clear this kind of financial instrument continues to be used to this day by the banks, and since FASB has effectively legalized accounting fraud, they don’t have to tell you they are losing money [11], [12]. The banks know they are insolvent, and for this reason many corporations have curtailed tax payments in order to hoard cash [13], [14].  The cash hoard now totals over $1.2 trillion [15], and the banks will need it for the coming flood of foreclosures.  The other companies will need it as loans become more difficult to obtain.

Conclusions
The U.S. federal government spent several trillion dollars to bail out the financial system and clear toxic assets.  By all accounts, very little of bad debt has been cleared, and what remains on banks’ balance sheets gets more toxic by the day.  Our government’s failure to take meaningful action has allowed our financial system to remain broken.  The banks are unable or unwilling to make new loans which will severely limit both small business growth and job prospects going forward.  Furthermore, another liquidity driven financial crisis is likely to occur in the future due to losses in residential and commercial real estate markets.  This crisis will put most major asset classes (e.g. stocks, bonds, etc.) under extreme pressure as banks are forced into further deleveraging.  Serious measures should be taken to guard against risks imposed by the banks' implicit insolvency.  I will attempt to address these measures in a future post.